Talk:100 gecs tree

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative music Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Illinois Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Monster Energy cans, pregnancy tests, and "other pop culture detritus" have been left as offerings at the 100 gecs Tree? Source: [1]: "the offerings they leave behind... cans of Monster Energy, and other pop culture detritus... 'There were cigarettes and pregnancy tests,' remembers Kylie"
  • ALT1: ... that the 100 gecs Tree is listed as a "place of worship" on Google Maps? Source: [2]: "Labelled by Google as a ​'place of worship'"...
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bruton Smith

Created by AviationFreak (talk). Self-nominated at 17:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/100 gecs Tree; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Seems good to go. Nice article, would recommend use of either hook, personally prefer ALT1. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 22:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)