Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

Talk:2012 in aviation

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconAviation
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B checklist
WikiProject iconYears Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLists Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Flyable Super Connie

edit

I removed the claim that the EC-121 was the only flyable Super Constellation, but it has been restored with a reference, however I cant find any indication that HB-RSC has been grounded http://www.superconstellation.org/ MilborneOne (talk) 21:37, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough, and I personally have no idea how many Super Connies are still flyable. But it is what the source (Aviation History magazine) unambiguously says. Maybe the other Super Connie you mentioned was grounded at the time of the publication of the edition (it says "currently" flyable, and "currently" implies that it either recently was not the only flyable one or there is some anticipation that another one soon will become flyable) Or maybe there are other Connies that are flyable, but this is the only Super Connie that is? But I don't know what the author who picked that wording was thinking. Mdnavman (talk) 21:47, 7 March 2012 (UTC)mdnavmanReply
This source[1] states that HB-RSC was grounded for the 2010 season due to wing corrosion. However, this one[2] says it was flown to Zurich in April 2011. This source[3] says HB-RSC began its life as a C-121, which may be where the source in the article's claim is coming from? --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 20:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
  1. ^ Allnutt, Richard Mallory. "Combat Veteran 'Spit' For Vintage Wings." Aircraft Illustrated 43.3 (2010): 10. Associates Programs Source Plus. Web. 13 Sept. 2012.
  2. ^ Frei, Ernst. "The Star Of Switzerland." Aircraft Illustrated 44.11 (2011): 46. Associates Programs Source Plus. Web. 13 Sept. 2012.
  3. ^ "Straight & Level." Flight International 176.(2009): 31. Science Full Text Selec (H.W. Wilson). Web. 13 Sept. 2012.

e-volo VC2 first flight

edit

The reference cited states that the VC2 was unveiled in July 2012, but it does not explicitly state that it flew at the unveiling. However, the same article does note that when the company debuted the VC1 in October 2011, it flew ten feet off the ground for 90 seconds. It's not unreasonable to assume that the VC2 flew at its premier, but it would be an assumption, not a referenced fact. I can find no other sources to verify. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 20:20, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2012 in aviation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2012 in aviation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply