Talk:45th Parallel (organization)

Oregon Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources

• http://www.portlandsocietypage.com/2013/02/17/club-mod-a-century-of-american-music-rings-true-for-45th-parallel-fans/
• http://www.artslandia.com/the-usual-suspects-greg-ewer/
• http://www.orartswatch.org/weekend-musicwatch-new-sounds-abound/
• http://www.orartswatch.org/year-end-musicwatch-lessons-and-observations-from-2012/
• http://www.orartswatch.org/musicwatch-reviews-less-is-more/
• http://www.orartswatch.org/news-notes-defending-my-homie/
• http://www.orartswatch.org/weekend-musicwatch-everything-new-is-old-again/
• http://www.orartswatch.org/weekend-musicwatch-musical-pictures-at-exhibition/
• http://northwestreverb.blogspot.com/2010/01/saturday-night-january-16th-marked.h

--Another Believer _(Talk) 21:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

COI

In accordance with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, I have chosen to disclose that I have a personal connection to this subject. I will spare details, but my main purpose in writing this article is to benefit Wikipedia and its mission. I believe this article is written from a neutral perspective and has been constructed from independent, reliable sources. The second link above provides the following summary, which I believe I have followed appropriately:

• Be transparent about your conflict of interest ( Done)
• Subjects require significant coverage in independent reliable sources. ( Done)
• Your role is to inform and reference, not promote or sell. ( Done)
• Be extremely cautious about the risks of editing articles about yourself or your clients ( Done|N/A)
• If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject. ( Done)
• State facts and statistics, don't be vague or general. ( Done)
• Take time to get sources and policy right. ( Done)
• Get neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors to review your draft. ( Doing...)
• Work with the community and we'll work with you. ( Doing...)
• Communicate, communicate, communicate. ( Doing...)

My ultimate goal is to promote this article to Good status. I understand this will require review and assistance from other members of the community, which is great. I invite all to examine this article carefully to make sure the content is fair and accurate. Feel free to contact me if you have any concerns. --Another Believer _(Talk) 21:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)