Talk:Apology video

YouTube Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject YouTube To-do: edit history watch purge A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see list. Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles Cleanup : See cleanup listing Maintain : This WikiProject Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles Other : Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Sources that can help

These might help me while writing later so putting these here for now for future me to deal with:

• Academic journal article
• AV Club
• Complex
• Financial Times
• Mashable
• Thesis
• Vox

ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 21:36, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

• Oh, and this. ツ LunaEatsTuna (💬)— 09:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

"insincere"? Isn't that biased?

I know you have sources to back you up, but not all of htem are incincere, especially with Watcher's recent apology video CarryingTheMeme (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

@CarryingTheMeme: You have a good point—I have removed that part from the lead. Template:LunaEatsTunaSig (talk), posted at 18:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)