Talk:Arsenal ship

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

United States Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / Operation Majestic Titan

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met
Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Operation Majestic Titan (Phase V)

real

We have enough to do with real concepts let alone proposed ones where who's doing the proposing is not even mentioned. Eclecticology, Sunday, July 14, 2002

Merge?

Now that I've sorted out the SC21 (United States) article (and included a reasonably grown-up section on the Arsenal Ship), would it make sense to merge this article into that one, the AS did end up as part of the SC-21 program even if it started out separately? I'm 50:50 about merging - I'm sure this article could be much bigger (I've seen a big DARPA report on it somewhere for instance), but it would also benefit from the context it gains from being part of the SC-21 article, and it saves duplication.

Incidentally N2e and others - it looks like that bibliography has been copied from | the Driesbach thesis - I suspect some of the crud you removed was also derived from that, but someone couldn't work out how to do inline citations (as Driesbach did), so they just copied out Driesbach's book list. I'm sure they're all solid references, but you can probably only find them if you have access to the library at the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey... 82.3.242.144 (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arsenal ship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927160919/http://www.warship-21.com/pages/936010/index.htm to http://www.warship-21.com/pages/936010/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 18 October 2016 (UTC)