Talk:Battle of Agincourt

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Agincourt article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

• Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
• New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

• Assume good faith
• Be polite and avoid personal attacks
• Be welcoming to newcomers
• Seek dispute resolution if needed

Article policies

• Neutral point of view
• No original research
• Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWLArchives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 100 days 

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:France High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / French / Medieval

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force French military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Middle Ages High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

England High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.

1000 yards?

At some point the assertion seems to have been added to the article that the French were 1000 yards away from the English: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Agincourt&diff=prev&oldid=832221295 This may have been a good faith edit but I'm struggling to understand it. Henry ordered his army to advance to within extreme longbow shot range, which is generally given as about 300 yards. I've checked and Mortimer (p.420) says of the night before the battle: "The two camps were no more than 1,200 yards apart; one source says their front lines were as close as 250 paces." He then suggests that the English would have had to move forward "seven or eight hundred yards" (p.436), which is consistent with the lines starting 1,000 yards apart, but being more like 300 yards apart when the longbowmen started shooting. The point of that particular paragraph in the Wikipedia article is how far the French had to advance under longbow fire; they certainly didn't have to advance 1,000 yards under longbow fire. I will therefore revert it to 300 yards unless anyone has any major objections. Merlinme (talk) 23:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

There seems some confusion between the distance apart of the two armies at the beginning of the battle and how far the French may have had to go while being shot at. The original version, with 300 yds, (roughly) fits the latter, the 1,000 yds even more approximately fits the former (various estimates are in the sources). Given the confusion of starting points, how far the English moved, what the actual range at which the English would have started sustained shooting (which is when the attached source quote is referring to), the whole sentence could do with reconsideration. Certainly, in its current form it is misleading. Monstrelet (talk) 12:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)