Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

Talk:Byblos

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 65.60.129.28
This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconPhoenicia Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCities
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconReligion: Interfaith Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconLebanon High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAncient Egypt Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:
  • Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

  • Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

  • Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

  • Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

  • Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

WikiProject iconAncient Near East Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

"The name seems to derive from gb (𐤂𐤁, "well") and ʾl (𐤀𐤋, "god")..."

The problem with this proposed etymology is that it is not reflected in ANY of the early spellings. The gbl ("mountain") trilateral root is problematic because it does not fit the location.

The difficulties with these etymologies need to be made explicit in the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.129.28 (talk) 00:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Need map and governorate

edit

This article needs a map and the name of the governorate Byblos is part of. Badagnani 22:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC) proteckfirst — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6011:5502:8AEA:A99A:1839:4876:AE50 (talk) 22:25, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Merge

edit

I see that there are several stub articles that have been split off, relating to individual tourist attractions in Byblos. I recommend that they be merged back into the main article for now, since they really don't have much in the way of information or sources. Then if more information becomes available later that extends it past a couple paragraphs, it'll be easy enough to split things out to a separate article again. --Elonka 18:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

This information might be better located at   Byblos travel guide from Wikivoyage. --Elonka 20:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

- Oppose These articles were not split off from the main article as the tourism section was added recently. They are important enough to have seperate enrtries on their own and they will be expanded further. BlingBling10 01:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why is it not mentioned that the word "bible" comes from the name "byblos"? 141.152.247.183 (talk) 07:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

edit

Seems to be a giant hole in the article by not mentioning that.

Fixed 24 January 2015. --Observer6 (talk) 14:39, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

somebody inserted wrongly text in first sentence

edit

This article starts with an inserted phrase that not only seems incorrect but also does not respect punctuation.

Now, it says:

Byblos The name originated from the Greek word biblion [1] which means Book and the City was known as Papyrus [2], because this commercial center was important in the papyrus trade. (Greek: Βύβλος) is the Greek name of the Phoenician city Gebal

So it seems that the part "The name originated from the Greek word biblion [1] which means Book and the City was known as Papyrus [2], because this commercial center was important in the papyrus trade. (Greek: Βύβλος)"

was inserted and that the original sentence was: Byblos is the Greek name of the Phoenician city Gebal

first of all there is no respect for punctuation while inserting, and secondly the issue about the word biblion and Papyrus appears below in a much more clear way.

I suggest to just eliminate the inserted phrase.

Camilo Ramada [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.21.11.75 (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'll have to admit that the first source in the lead, the Beirut International Dental Meeting, is not exactly the sort of source that should be used in an article. In fact it's a good example of what not to use. Your idea sounds sensible. Dougweller (talk) 16:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've done as you suggested, and am now looking at the editor's other edits. I wish I hadn't looked at this! Dougweller (talk) 16:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Threats to Byblos

edit

"The 2006 Lebanon War negatively affected this ancient site by covering the harbor and town walls with an oil slick"

What does this actually mean? How can a war cover anything with an oil slick? Did the war suddenly get up one morning and think "I know what, I'll go and paint the town walls with oil"? Is it still a slick when it's coating the walls (surely an oil slick is when the oil is floating on water!)? Does it mean the town was affected by an oil slick during the war? What was the effect of the oil slick? How was it caused? Was it ever cleaned up or is the town still under a metre thick layer of the gooey black stuff? Did it have any affect on the health of the inhabitants? Is a whole section really justified for this one liner? Would Lebanese civil war be a better heading for the section, if it remains? More questions than answers! Skinsmoke (talk) 02:23, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

JUBAYL

edit

Why is this article called byblos and not the city's current name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.41.197 (talk) 07:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Byblos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Byblos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Etymology

edit
The article claims: "The name seems to derive from GB (𐤂𐤁, "well") and ʾL (𐤀𐤋, "god"), the latter a word that could variously refer to any of the Canaanite gods or to their leader in particular. The name thus seems to have meant the "Well" or "Source of the God"."
Where is the reference for this claim? I have not been able to find any documented source that corroborates this supposed etymology.
Aside from the fact that Phoenician script was written right to left (in contrast to the above-written words in Phoenician characters), the purported etymology fails to explain the loss of the letter "Aleph" when going from GB 'L to GBL.
Every reference I have been able to find traces the etymology of the Phoenician name of the city Gebal (Byblos) to the trilateral Semitic route GBL meaning "border", "frontier", "mountain".
In light of what is written in the article that the early Neolithic settlement of Byblos "was located on the seaward slope of the larger of the two hills that used to compose ancient Byblos", this etymology makes perfect sense. This etymology is also better explained by the Akkadian form "Gubla".
Unless a reliable source can be cited in support of the cited "Source of the God" etymology, it should be changed in support of the well-documented GBL etymology.
Jacob D (talk) 09:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Jacob DReply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply