This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Caister Castle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
Correction
editI removed (In fact Henry VI granted 23 licences to crenellate but not one for Caister castle. Fastolf was one of a group of men granted a licence to crenellate Rye House, Hertfordshire. This error arises from misconception about licences to crenellate being a requirement to build castles. (Ref. Davis, P., 2007, 'English Licences to Crenellate 1199-1567' Castle Studies Group Journal Vol. 20)) this as it had been put in the lead, a bit intrusively. It may well be correct~i expect it is, but i cannot properly correctit now,becauseo f the lack of accessto my PC.Cheers, LindsayHello 04:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- I don't have the article to hand, but the footnote certainly rings true to what I've read recently on licences to crenellate. I've changed the information into the form of a footnote for now, although I think it could go in the main body of the article. Nev1 (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, Nev1. I think what you did looksgood,or even could be worked in, as you suggest,in the main body. I'dprobably try the latter,would'vedoneyesterday,but the accesi have is rotten at the moment 9in fact, i've not really contributedfora week ormore becauseof it), not to mention this keyboard which doesn'tlike me at all! Cheers, LindsayHello 18:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Plan of the castle
edithttp://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11243969936/
©Geni (talk) 00:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- You may be noticing a pattern. Thanks Geni. Nev1 (talk) 19:42, 16 December 2013 (UTC)