Talk:Christadelphians

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Christianity Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comparisons to other groups

The theology comparisons are proselytizing and not informative. They should be deleted. (crazenate) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.28.9.135 (talk) 16:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

I agree with the above comment. The Comparisons section is essentially an apologetic work and contains numerous claims which are dubious or debatable, including: Clement of Rome's beliefs about the intermediate state, Jonathan ben Uzziel's beliefs about Satan, the Christology of the Nazarenes, etc. Tjfarrar1983 (talk) 09:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

I also agree. Anyone opposed to removing this section?Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Basing their beliefs solely on the Bible ... not

They are Millerites because they follow the Day-year principle. So the notion that they base their beliefs solely on the Bible is their own fiction. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 18:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Of course. Nobody does straight Bible all by itself. What should we change in the article? Alephb (talk) 20:45, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Nevermind. Found it! Alephb (talk) 20:48, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

An Apology to Anyone Watching This Article

After a fairly long editing spree, I just discovered the page WP:LINKROT and discovered that I may have removed some dead links from this page that I should not have removed. Any time I dedicate to Wikipedia will be focused on restoring any links I should not have removed from this article until I have restored them all. My apologies. I had it in my head that dead links could simply be removed, and it seems I was wrong. I'll work to make the problem right. After this I'll check John Thomas and see if I removed any links I shouldn't have. If you notice any other times I've violated WP:LINKROT, I'll work to fix those violations as well. In the future I intend to work through the processes recommended at WP:LINKROT first. Alephb (talk) 01:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

All right. I reverted my whole editing spree, the article is in the condition I found it in. Alephb (talk) 01:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Christadelphians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080227081848/http://lesliemorrell.com/papers/Response.pdf to http://lesliemorrell.com/papers/Response.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131219110110/http://www.monroechristadelphians.com/browser/unamendedsof.html to http://www.monroechristadelphians.com/browser/unamendedsof.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bibleed.com/bibleteachings/christianlife/marriage.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131007005450/http://isaac-newton.org/heretic.pdf to http://www.isaac-newton.org/heretic.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100304023120/http://www.thechristadelphian.com/pamphlets/standardseries/whoarecdels.html to http://www.thechristadelphian.com/pamphlets/standardseries/whoarecdels.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thechristadelphian.com/acatalog/Foundations.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC)