| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hasbro article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. | |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
 | This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as High-importance). | |
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |||||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. | |||||
| ||||||
| This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |||||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. | |||||
| ||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
Hospital
editI wondered if anybody knew or thought it relevant that Hasbro founded a children's hospital here in RI...it's truly wonderful and called the Hasbro Children's Hospital. I don't actually know to what extent it was funded by the hasbro company, but assume it must have been substantial to have provided the name.
Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2020
edit|answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.Hi I would like to make a edit because I found this link saying that hasbro has reported a lost, and it wasn’t because of the Coronavirus (I wasn’t doing anything wrong). Link:https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/05/06/1-factor-took-hasbro-to-loss-hint-not-coronavirus.aspx.2600:1004:B01E:280B:9948:A0D9:F8DF:A54B (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 21:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- I want to do it on the history 2008-percent section, I want to add stuff.2600:1004:B01E:280B:9948:A0D9:F8DF:A54B (talk) 21:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2020 (2nd attempt)
edit|answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.I want to add this piece of information just recently released about hasbro reporting a loss from buying Entertainment One. Link:https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/05/06/1-factor-took-hasbro-to-loss-hint-not-coronavirus.aspx.2600:1004:B01E:280B:9948:A0D9:F8DF:A54B (talk) 21:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. It's still not clear what changes you want to make. Edit requests must be precise, as in the exact text you want to add or change, and where. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
This page needs admin attention from this vandal that seems to wish to get into a edit war with other users, because they disagree with something being added ot the article. To my knowledge Wikipedia was about a consensus, not one user rules the entire site, and several users are trying to include news, while one user says they re not allowed to and constantly deleted their edits through reversion. Recent events are not able to updated instantly, and other editors must give people time to find proper and relevant sources, and should not be allowed to start an edit war over them, so why is this user constantly doing this for the past week on this article? shadzar-talk 03:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, if you would like to report me for vandalism, please do so at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. However, I would advise that you read what constitutes vandalism before you do. In any case, I found a source that meets WP:RS and edited the text in a way that should meet the reliable sourcing policy. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 04:06, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Sweatshop labor
editIf there are better refs to be found, we should probably mention something about this. As it was [1], it appears to be simply soapboxing for business-humanrights.org, which I can find no RSN discussions on, and appears to be something to be treated as a primary source with no weight of it's own. I don't see it mentioned in either of the independent sources, so there's nothing to give it any weight.
Since years have passed since the reports were released, we need better refs to demonstrate encyclopedic value. --Hipal (talk) 18:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)