Talk:Internet appliance

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance).

Internet High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Electronics Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Definition

So in principle, an Internet appliance is a portable, wireless dumb terminal? JIP | Talk 14:48, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

No, it simply means "a single purpose thingy for accessing the internet". Those kiosks in airports that let you browse the web are internet applicances, as are WebTVs. They can be, but certainly don't have to be, either wireless or portable, and even the walled-garden variety aren't really dumb enough to be dumb terminals like a Sun Ray. Indeed, most (all, really) internet applicances failed because they weren't dumb (and thus cheap) enough: you could get a cheap PC for the cost of an Audrey (or a small amount more), and do all the same stuff and much more (PCs having overwhelming economies of scale). Truly dumb terminals have never worked in the home, because the connection was (and probably still is, really) too poor. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 17:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Merge of Information appliance

• Oppose - connectivity may not necessarily imply internet. Some cell phones, an information appliance, doesn't have internet connectivity. Also POS devices, etc. that connect don't necessarily have internet.--Jondel 02:41, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose - internet applicances are, I suppose, a subset of info appliances, but the important distinction is the intention of the device - internet applicances are specifically intended to present the internet to the user, in a way not dissimilar to that of a PC user (they should really be called WebMailChat applicances, but they aren't). Info appliances might have an internet connection, but that's a detail of how they function (a POS device could have an internet connection, a modem, an ISDN connection, or nothing - it'd still be an info applicance, but as its job isn't to deliver that webmailchat user experience, it's not an internet applicance). -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 17:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Def. Needs to be corrected

These types of devices may have a hard drive and may actually be in fact a computer that performs a function or functions that in effect interact with the internet but do not use a computer to interface with the app. or Internet. --Akc9000 18:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

While I happen to completely agree with the bias, the article is most definitely biased against proprietary technology. Referring to open standards as "ideal" shows bias not fitting of an encyclopedia Scheater5 12:56, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

File:Webconverger.png Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Webconverger.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

iPad

Why is the iPad considered an internet appliance? Isn't it's main function to run software from the App Store (on the device). --MiffTheFox (talk) 23:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Good question. It runs fine offline, there's countless apps that don't require internet, and it's hardly as limited in scope as even a Chromebook. I think it should be removed from this list. FireLordAang (talk) 03:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)