Talk:Land value tax
Latest comment: 18 days ago by Janosabel in topic Objections should be included
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Land value tax article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 365 days  |
 | Land value tax was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Former good article nominee | |||||||||||||
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. |
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
|
Lack of Source for Meji Restoration
editNo source was given for the claim that there was a land value tax implemented during the Meji restoration. Specifics are even given which makes it even more problematic. Maybe it is from another source in the article, but it must be made explicitly. What should be done?--MrMineHeads (talk) 22:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Here's a link to an academic paper on the topic.
- I searched for "meiji restoration property taxes" and it was the first link returned. So there may be better articles. -- Derek Ross | Talk 20:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Needs a deeper explanation
editThe fundamental base of LVT is reclaiming commonly created wealth to use for common purposes. Nowhere does it say this. . 152.37.76.153 (talk) 16:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Quite agree.
- This is the strong argument in favour. Privatizing this publicly created value is evidently out of order. There are documented arguments stressing this. Guy Standing is one good source.
- For the size of this common value I find this very instructive:
- https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/chapter4-economic-evidence-base-2016.pdf Janosabel (talk) 10:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Objections should be included
editEstablishment blockers hide behind silence
editReopen Archived? Talk:Land value tax/Archive 1#Claimed disadvantages
Janosabel (talk) 11:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)