Talk:Light pollution
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Light pollution article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 120 days  |
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
.jpg){kind=small}
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia. | |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
| This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. | |
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
| This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles. | |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Its members are universities, public administrations, representatives of manifacturing industries and so on. It produced a specific standard UNI 10819 to (very theoretically) protect the sky from light pollution and some lectures to defend it against the hordes of people that recognized how that standard LEGALIZED light pollution rather than reduce it, but if every one agree I can try to translate their thoughts. To point out how scientists can vary their opinions about this topic it could be useful to summarize prof Zichichi article on catholic magazine "Famiglia Cristiana" and the remarks of prof Maffei, an italian astronomer who pionereed infrared photografic surveys to Zichichi's article. Again, I can traslate. As a final suggestion based on my own experience in Italy I have to remark that the "dispute" about light pollution depends on the strong relationship that links light and energy industries, universities, politicians. Light and energy industries are trying to increase profits and do not accept any regulamentation, universities have to defend their own business and do not like that someone else discovers and applies cheaper and environmental safe lighting rules, politicians fear to lose a powerful argument to gain votes, summarized as "daylight intensity lighting for safety against crime". But I have to remark that only 7 1/2 italian regions on 20, 40% of land and 30% of population have to bear "industrial" lighting rules: in 2007 Liguria, Friuli Venezia Giulia and half of Trentino Alto Adige rejected UNI standards to adopt "zero lighting above lamps" rules. How can exist a "dispute" about light pollution when the majority of a nation says that night skies have to be protected ? --195.210.65.30 (talk) 08:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
|
To-do list
editHere's a list of possible things that the article might benefit from, in no particular order:
1. Remove the liberal bias from the article. Oh wait, you wouldn't have an article without that...
- Reality has a liberal bias. Not necessarily for things that only affect relations between humans (whether kookoo anarchists should let legal heroin stores open in front of schools or not, is Hamas evil..) but definitely for environmental things. The conservative track record is very bad on that. And don't say liberal is tree hugging people that want no wood to be used ever and think the tree's spirit speaks to them, the average liberal's nothing like that.
Feel welcome to edit the list, of course. Izogi 23:55, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: BioEE1610 WIM
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 March 2022 and 31 March 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pdt35 (article contribs).
Science
editWhat light pollution causes
pollution causes 103.203.230.25 (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Urban Pollution and Remediation
edit This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2024 and 30 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jessicasabatini, Djfocus24 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: MARMISAHM, Omenlaptop15.
— Assignment last updated by Tshaible (talk) 18:18, 20 March 2024 (UTC)