Talk:Lipošćak affair

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lipošćak affair article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

• Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
• New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

• Assume good faith
• Be polite and avoid personal attacks
• Be welcoming to newcomers
• Seek dispute resolution if needed

Article policies

• Neutral point of view
• No original research
• Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Military history: Balkan / European / World War I

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Associated task forces: /  Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present) European military history task force World War I task force

Croatia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yugoslavia Low‑importance

	Lipošćak affair is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rating rationale

Sadenar40000, it would be helpful if you explained your rating rationale. Specifically, I believe the article warrants B-class, so could you please specify what's missing so your input could be actionable. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

If you are of the opinion that this is a B class, feel free to alter the rating I made by following the B class checklist, taking a second look at this article makes me think that the sourcing does warrant more of a B than a C class rating on this one, my excuses for any trouble made. Sadenar40000 (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. I will leave rating to others because WP:MILHIST requires B-class assessment be performed by editors other than principal authors. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

B class review

@Tomobe03: I assessed as B class. However, there seems to be a verb missing from the following sentence (Background sentence 1). Please review and fix. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 03:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

• "On 5–6 October, in the final weeks of the First World War, representatives of political parties representing the Croats, the Serbs, and the Slovenes living in Austria-Hungary the National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs as a representative body with the aim of achieving independence from the empire."

@Djmaschek: Yes, one was missing. I added it now. Thanks for the assessment and the pointer.--Tomobe03 (talk) 07:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lipošćak affair/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 18:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Tomobe03! I'll be reviewing this and the other two articles due to the ongoing GAN backlog. I will start the review a bit later. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments

General

• "(Afera Lipošćak)" → ({{lang-sh|Afera Lipošćak}})
• Link Slovene People's Party with Slovene People's Party (historical), the current link redirects to the modern reincarnation.
• Typo: abd → and.
• "The National Council resorted to conscription..." – missing space at the start of the sentence.
• Rest of the text is alright. It meets the criteria.
• Copyvios unlikely.
  • I believe I have addressed the above now.--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:08, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Images

• All are alright. I would prefer the addition of alt texts though.
  • I plan to move this to ACR later on (time permitting) and add alt text before that nomination.--Tomobe03 (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Sources

• All are alright.

On hold until this gets fixed. --Vacant0 (talk) 16:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Promoting. --Vacant0 (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2022 (UTC)