Talk:Lynn Boylan

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Biography: Politics and Government

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Ireland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European Union

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

There are some issues affecting succession boxes which could affect this person and several other Irish politicians being discussed at Talk:Nick Griffin and the Wikipedia:No original research noticeboard. PatGallacher (talk) 23:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lynn Boylan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160406073545/https://www.amnesty.ie/freeibrahim to https://www.amnesty.ie/freeibrahim

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

False claims on Boylans qualifications.

false claim on qualifications. The actual qualification level is unlikely to be accurate here. Provide actual level of qualification - post grad or not? If she never did a degree, it is unlikely she did a post grad course. It could be resolved by reference to the actual qualification instead of the dubious vague descriptions. An poblacht magazine does not constitute a reliable reference and is also suspiciously vague in the article. 109.76.9.229 (talk) 17:42, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi. In terms of:

• WP:RS. Whether and in what circumstances An Phoblacht may be considered reliable is covered in WP:RSP#An_Phoblacht.
• WP:AD. If a statement is disputed, you can tag it. Please don't add your own thoughts/commentary/etc to the main Article namespace. And certainly not in a way that may cause issues with WP:LBL. (With terms like "dishonest". When "disputed" is less loaded. And when Hanlon's razor may apply.)
• WP:CON. I, for one, am largely comfortable with the change from "went on to earn post-graduate qualifications from [UCD]" to "went on to earn qualifications from [UCD]". Effectively just striking the "post-graduate" part. Although the "journey" to the compromise wording wasn't exactly ideal.

Bye. Guliolopez (talk) 19:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)