Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Former good article nomineeMunich was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 27, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
June 29, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconCities
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconGermany: Munich Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Munich (assessed as Top-importance).
Note icon
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the |unref= from this template.
WikiProject iconBavaria Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconOlympics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
OpenStreetMap held a mapping party in this area on 21-22 October 2006 to make a creative commons licensed map that may be used in Wikipedia articles.

Thanks to all those wikipedians that took part.

See http://www.openstreetmap.org for details of other planned mapping parties.

Population

edit

The current population is 1.539.298 (Stand: 31.10.2018). I tried correcting the article but it was too difficult. Could someone please correct this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.78.150.59 (talk) 03:46, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Name in Bavarian

edit

Being Bavarian myself, I have honestly never heard anybody calling München "Minna". Everybody says "Minga" or, much less common, "Micha". I am quite certain that "Minna" is not more common than "Minga", at least not for Bavarians. So maybe this article should only use "Minga", as it can be seen in the corresponding German article about this city. 2601:240:8201:F170:2414:E637:E55D:AEDE (talk) 05:33, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Do you have a published, reliable source for that? Dgndenver (talk) 05:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Minorities in Munich

edit

Minorities seem to be mentioned only as stereotypes in this article and connected articles. The only mention of the gay community is under a "Nightlife" section. The Turkish-speaking people are mentioned briefly in Ludwigsvorstadt-Isarvorstadt. Nemo 08:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

WMO data on Munich's (and Germany's) precipitation days

edit

(Copied over from WP:WEATHER, this problem exists in many German city articles, but this is by far the most popular.)

It seems that there is an inconsistency with WMO data on German precipitation days. WMO data regularly shows 40-50 days more of precipitation than the DWD or Infoclimat, while using the same threshold (that'd be 1.0mm). Examples abound, but aside from this article (compare Infoclimat), Konstanz is another good example. My guess is that the WMO numbers are actually using a 0.1mm threshold and are mislabeled, or are otherwise inaccurate. I will start removing these parameters in a few days if there are no objections or explanations. Uness232 (talk) 19:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply