Talk:Naled

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Similarities to G-Series nerve agents

While I agree on the matter of a molecule like Naled being somewhat distinct with respect to it's molecular structure when compared against "worse" AchE inhibiting organophosphorus agents I do not agree that there is no connection. Nerve agents are direct descendants of Dr. Schrader's original pesticide work and function much in the same, if not outright identical, manner. Just because there are large halogenated carbon groups providing steric interference and and lowering LD50 doesn't mean that the meat of the mechanism isn't there. The only (true) difference I can find in structure and function is the fact that Naled, like a large number of OP pesticides, does not possess a chiral phosphate moiety which is a calling card of nerve agents. I would hardly call that cause to discriminate between the two.

I would also raise the question of employment. If someone were looking at this from a military perspective, is there really a difference between something like Naled (or even better Parathion) and a 'true' nerve agent? They could both be employed in much the same way.

SirLorax (talk) 22:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes, there is relation in terms of chemical structure, but to compare naled to chemical weapons is inappropriately (and perhaps intentionally) inflammatory language. It is different enough in chemical structure and different enough in biological activity that regulatory agencies have determined that there is little risk associated with human exposure to it. Comparing something with low level of toxicity to something with extraordinarily high toxicity is just plain misleading. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naled. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120614041242/http://epa.gov/oppsrrd1/REDs/factsheets/naled_fs.htm to http://epa.gov/oppsrrd1/REDs/factsheets/naled_fs.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

chloride fumes

Don't exist cause they can't. Fumes of just ONE kind of ions are impossible. At some 1000° mixtures of ions (always positive and negative ones in equal amounts) are possible. As we live at moderate temperatures, toxic fumes by decomposition can be chlorine, bromine, hydrogen bromide, hydrogen chloride, and bromine chloride. Now we have the choice... --FK1954 (talk) 16:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)