Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

Talk:Quantum finance

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Johnjbarton in topic Deleted section "Instrument pricing"
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconEconomics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFinance & Investment Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPhysics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Too technical?

edit

I've added the 'Technical' tag as I thought this article assumes too much prior knowledge for a general audience. It reads a little like an academic literature review - is this its origin? I wonder whether using more real-world examples, and fleshing out the lede, might make it easier for a general reader to get into the article? Docben (talk) 22:55, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism?

edit

Someone appears to have conflated these pricing computations with some Q Anon "Quantum Financial System" nonsense. The introduction paragraph may now be misleading. I don't have the knowledge to correct the intro paragraph or the ability to restore the previous article. Just wanted to call attention to whoever may be able to address this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.95.242 (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deleted section "Instrument pricing"

edit

The section "Instrument pricing" has one reference completely unrelated to "quantum finance", it's just a claim about quantum computing. The rest of the section amounts to "gee if quantum computing works out it would be great for financial computing". It's WP:OR and off topic anyway. Johnjbarton (talk) 01:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply