This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
Writing systems Low‑importance | |||||||
|
WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. | |||
This article is supported by Egyptian religion work group (assessed as Mid-importance). | ||||
|
WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. | This article is within the scope of||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia. | This article is within the scope of||||||||||||||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |||||||||||||
|
WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force. |
WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
WikiProject Egypt. | This article is supported by||
This article is supported by WikiProject Sudan. |
Uraeus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information. | ||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
Picture
editToo many pictures? ~~~~ 19:45, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
Friends of Sabbath Reference
editI'm moving this section to the talk page for a bit of discussion. There are a couple of issues to discuss.
1) Can you please provide a proper citation for this reference. I am not the only editor that has brought up copyright concerns. In that citation can you please provide a page number for the specific section you are quoting for this support?
2) Can you edit your submission for proper grammar, including capitalizations? Also please review a bit to ensure it is written in an encylopedic manner.
3) Can you offer a bit to support that this source meets WP:RS requirements?
Here is the relevant text:
Seraphim
editThe judaeo-christian angelic seraphim, frequently associated with serpents, are thought to have derived from the concept of uraeus. Multiple-winged uraei amulets are well represented in Palestine.[1]
Thanks,
Squatch347 (talk) 17:32, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Squatch347 I fail to see the copyright issues. Are you seriously suggesting that Wikipedia's standards have declined so low that SOURCES DELIBERATELY MADE FREE BY THE WRITERS AND INSTITUTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THEM are off limits now?
I will restore the edits when I feel better.
- @Falconfly, I see you've made that statement a couple of times, can you please elaborate? Where did the author's specifically state that they hold no copyright claims to the text? Being free is not the same thing as not being copyrighted (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights).
- Additionally, can address the other two issues here before re-adding any text? Squatch347 (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- NM, didn't see A.Parrot's response in the other page, we can discuss it there. Thanks. Squatch347 (talk) 13:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)