Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

Talk:William, Prince of Wales

Latest comment: 1 month ago by MSincccc in topic Semi-protected edit request on 11 August 2024
Good articleWilliam, Prince of Wales has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowIn the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 14, 2023Good article nomineeListed
May 2, 2024Peer reviewReviewed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 31, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Prince William reportedly used the name "Steve" while studying at the University of St Andrews to avoid attracting attention from the media?
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on November 17, 2010.
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 21, 2024.
Current status: Good article
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the William, Prince of Wales article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWLArchives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconBiography: Military / Peerage and Baronetage / Royalty and Nobility
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconBritish Royalty Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Aviation / Biography / Maritime / British / European / Post-Cold War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military aviation task force
Taskforce icon
Military biography task force
Taskforce icon
Maritime warfare task force
Taskforce icon
British military history task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
Post-Cold War task force
WikiProject iconUnited Kingdom High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEngland High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWales High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLondon High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.


Section sizes
Section size for William, Prince of Wales (33 sections)
Section name Byte
count
Section
total
(Top) 5,814 5,814
Early life 15,630 15,630
Education 12,289 12,289
Early appointments and duties 8,873 34,116
Military and air ambulance service 25,243 25,243
Personal life 18 21,038
Relationship with Catherine Middleton 9,014 9,014
Marriage and children 12,006 12,006
Duke of Cambridge 26,979 26,979
Prince of Wales 10,705 10,705
Charity work 7,510 61,370
Humanitarian causes 8,090 8,090
Conservation 11,375 11,375
LGBT rights 1,960 1,960
Mental health 10,260 10,260
Homelessness 8,469 8,469
Sport 13,706 13,706
Public image 9,782 9,782
Privacy and the media 14,215 14,215
Titles, styles, and honours 100 6,719
Titles and styles 3,910 3,910
Honours 2,709 2,709
Ancestry 5,720 5,720
Bibliography 17 3,015
Book contributions 1,555 1,555
Authored letters and articles 1,443 1,443
See also 222 222
Footnotes 28 28
References 28 28
Further reading 20 1,983
Books 1,240 1,240
Articles 723 723
External links 5,071 5,071
Total 234,724 234,724
WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that Prince William was the first future heir to the British throne to be born in a hospital?

ALT 1:... that Prince William reportedly used the name "Steve" while studying at the University of St Andrews to avoid attracting attention from the media?

    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: As per Reviewer's suggestion and also because it meets the criteria

Improved to Good Article status by MSincccc (talk). Self-nominated at 16:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/William, Prince of Wales; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  • Not a review, just a comment, but I do have two suggestions: 1. I think the first hook could go without the mention of the hospital's name since the main point is that he was the first British heir to be born in a hospital and adding extra detail somewhat detracts from the point, and 2. while I think the original hook is pretty good, since this is Prince William we're talking about here, are there any other possible alternative hook suggestions you could give? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Since this hasn't been reviewed yet, I'll leave this to another reviewer, but I do think ALT1 is the more surprising hook here and thus probably the better option. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Article is evidently long enough and well written/sourced. It has recently been promoted to GA status. I'll trust that PQP isn't required yet for the nominator. Both hooks are interesting, though I have problems with both of them: the first (1st born in hospital) does not seem to be cited or mentioned in the article and surely, if this hook was to progress, it should say "heir to the British throne" or similar? The second hook (called himself "Steve") has a citation, but only to the homepage of the Herald Scotland, so without a full url, or page number, or access date, surely this citation isn't complete? I'd suggest the word "reportedly" is added to the hook if this one goes forward. Finally, the article has some issues which are being addressed on the Talk page, with reverts and heavy editing of the lede introduction. We might need to wait for this to be resolved before progressing the nomination. Sionk (talk) 21:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Well Sionk the discussion regarding lead has been peacefully resolved and thus you can proceed with the DYK nomination process if possible. (talk)
I've made the change to ALT0. For what it's worth, the hospital thing has been reported in multiple sources before (I remember reading about it before), such as Time and The Independent, so a source should easily be found to report on that. Looking online there are also multiple other reliable sources that mention the Steve thing so this is probably also another case where a source could just be added. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've added a better reference for "Steve" (FWIW many of the reliable sources mentioning this trivia item give their source as the Daily Mirror which is of indeterminate reliability, so I've selected a magazine that ought to be reliable, doesn't cite the Mirror, and hasn't been discussed at RS/R). Rosbif73 (talk) 18:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for improving the source for ALT 1. Before it's approved, I'm wondering whether it should say "Prince William, heir to the British throne, ... considering there are numerous Prince Williams. Sionk (talk) 22:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sionk Are we going to proceed with the nomination? The status shows that the hook has been reviewed. What's next? Will this ever appear on the Main Page of English Wikipedia. Just seeking an update from you. Regards MSincccc (talk) 10:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  DYK good to go with ALT1 hook. Citation query has been resolved. There's no great reason to further amend the hook because Prince William is blue linked. Sionk (talk) 16:54, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


Semi-protected edit request on 23 July 2024

edit
 This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add the category Category:Lord High Stewards of Scotland 98.228.137.44 (talk) 00:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done MSincccc (talk) 01:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concerns regarding the Prince of Wales's navbox

edit

Hello,

Editors of this article may be interested in knowing that I have raised concerns regarding the informaton presented in the Prince of Wales's navigation template on the corresponding talk page (Permalink to this post), especially concerning the listed film and television representations. Please feel free to give your input at the linked discussion section.

Thank you,

AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 17:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 11 August 2024

edit
 This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I want to translate this in Indonesian because in Indonesia there is no explanation about prince william Kayanad (talk) 13:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Go to the Indonesian Wikipedia and see how you can improve his article there. Also you can take some cues from here though mere copy-pasting across multiple Wikis are not generally encouraged. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 14:09, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply