Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland

Irish Wikipedians' notice board

Home

Irish Wikipedians' related news

Discussion

Ireland related discussion (at WikiProject Ireland).

Active Users

Active Irish Users

WikiProjects

Irish WikiProjects

Stubs

Major Irish stubs

Peer review

Articles on Peer review

FA

Articles on FA review

FA Drive

Articles under consideration for FA drive

Irish articles assessed by quality
 FA A GABCStartStub FLListCategoryDisambigDraftFilePortalProjectRedirectTemplateNA???Total
6602451,4455,48630,63226,94883,28725,9661827517526202,5513,176581100,347

Landmark

edit

On June 29th 2024 the 100,000th article was tagged to IrlProj. Sarah777 (talk) 22:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

That was nice, thanks for catching that, Sarah! It's amazing how much happened since '06/'07. And still so many more topics, time permitting... SeoR (talk) 11:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's a very satisfying milestone. Thanks for letting us know, Sarah. We should have had cake. Spideog (talk) 22:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Killucan helicopter crash article deletion discussion

edit

The article Killucan helicopter crash has been proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killucan helicopter crash. Spideog (talk) 00:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

This notice is now moot. The article was deleted after discussion. Spideog (talk) 07:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

We should have a recommended style on MOS:IRELAND/MOS:LAW for titles of articles on Irish case law. Over on Category:Supreme Court of Ireland cases, you can see a lack of consistency in use of punctuation and abbreviations, and in the number of parties named. I could go either way on punctuation, but in most cases, one party only should be named on either side of the v (no need to include & anor). If a case is reported in the Irish Reports or Irish Law Reports Monthly, our standard law reports, we could use the running title there as a recognised short title or common name for the judgment. Within articles, there are other matters of style to consider as well. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 09:03, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Supreme Court cases: Duplication of articles

edit

Related to the above discussion, but a separate matter, there are quite a few duplicate articles on the same case

Someone might want to have a look at them to see which is better to keep in each case, considering both content and the extent of article history. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 18:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Lisa Hannigan

edit

Lisa Hannigan has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply