An ichnotaxon (plural ichnotaxa) is "a taxon based on the fossilized work of an organism", i.e. the non-human equivalent of an artifact. Ichnotaxon comes from the Ancient Greek ἴχνος (íchnos) meaning "track" and English taxon, itself derived from Ancient Greek τάξις (táxis) meaning "ordering".[1]
Ichnotaxa are names used to identify and distinguish morphologically distinctive ichnofossils, more commonly known as trace fossils (fossil records of lifeforms' movement, rather than of the lifeforms themselves). They are assigned genus and species ranks by ichnologists, much like organisms in Linnaean taxonomy. These are known as ichnogenera and ichnospecies, respectively. "Ichnogenus" and "ichnospecies" are commonly abbreviated as "igen." and "isp.". The binomial names of ichnospecies and their genera are to be written in italics.
Most researchers classify trace fossils only as far as the ichnogenus rank, based upon trace fossils that resemble each other in morphology but have subtle differences. Some authors have constructed detailed hierarchies up to ichnosuperclass, recognizing such fine detail as to identify ichnosuperorder and ichnoinfraclass, but such attempts are controversial.
YouTube Encyclopedic
-
1/3Views:31 304450 8718 653
-
Batrachopus grandis: A Bipedal Crocodile Relative From the Time Of The Dinosaurs
-
When Pterosaurs Walked
-
Mamaliformes do Cretáceo Brasileiro
Transcription
Naming
Due to the chaotic nature of trace fossil classification, several ichnogenera hold names normally affiliated with animal body fossils or plant fossils. For example, many ichnogenera are named with the suffix -phycus due to misidentification as algae.[2]
Edward Hitchcock was the first to use the now common -ichnus suffix in 1858, with Cochlichnus.[2]
History
Due to trace fossils' history of being difficult to classify, there have been several attempts to enforce consistency in the naming of ichnotaxa.
The first edition of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, published in 1961, ruled that names of taxa published after 1930 should be 'accompanied by a statement that purports to give characters differentiating the taxon'. This had the effect that names for most trace fossil taxa published after 1930 were unavailable under the code. This restriction was removed for ichnotaxa in the third edition of the code, published in 1985.[3][4]
See also
References
- ^ Definition of 'ichno' at dictionary.com.
- ^ a b Häntzschel, Walter (1975). Moore, Raymond C. (ed.). Miscellanea: Supplement 1, Trace Fossils and Problematica. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Geological Society of America. ISBN 9780813730271.
- ^ Bromley, R. G. (1996). "Ichnotaxonomy and classification". Trace Fossils: Biology, Taphonomy and Applications. London: Chapman & Hall. pp. 162–163. ISBN 9780412614804.
- ^ Donovan, Stephen K., ed. (28 March 1994). The Palaeobiology of Trace Fossils. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-94843-8.
External links
- Comments on the draft proposal to amend the Code with respect to trace fossils
- Trace Fossils - Kansas University Catalogue of Ichnotaxa
This page was last edited on 8 May 2024, at 03:58