Consent procedure
This article is part of a series on |
![]() |
---|
![]() |
The consent procedure (formerly assent procedure) is one of the special legislative procedures of the European Union. Introduced by the Single European Act, under this procedure, the Council of the European Union must obtain the European Parliament's consent (assent) before certain decisions can be made. Acceptance (consent) requires an absolute majority of votes in Parliament.
Application[edit]
Under the Treaty of Lisbon, the consent procedure's applications include:[1]
- horizontal flexibility clause (art. 352 TFEU),
- combating discrimination (Article 19(1) TFEU),
- membership of the Union (Article 49 TEU),
- arrangements for withdrawal from the Union (Article 50 TEU)
- association agreements,
- accession of the Union to the ECHR,
- agreements establishing a specific institutional framework,
- agreements with important budgetary implications,
- agreements in areas where the ordinary legislative procedure applies.
History[edit]
Single European Act[edit]
The assent procedure was introduced by the Single European Act. Under this procedure, the Council of the European Union must obtain Parliament's assent before certain decisions can be made. Acceptance ("assent") requires an absolute majority of votes.
The European Parliament can accept or reject the proposal but not amend it. However, the Parliament can produce an interim report making recommendations for modifications, and a conciliation has also been introduced.[2]
The areas included under the assent procedure were:
- specific tasks of the European Central Bank (ECB);
- amendments of statutes of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) / European Central Bank;
- Structural Funds and Cohesion Funds;
- the uniform electoral procedure for the European Parliament;
- certain international agreements;
- the accession of new member states;
- approval of the President and the other members of the Commission
Treaty of Amsterdam[edit]
Following the adoption of the Treaty of Amsterdam, sanctions imposed on an EU Member State for a serious and persistent breach of fundamental rights requires Parliament's assent under Article 7 of the EU Treaty.
In its opinion on the 2000 Intergovernmental Conference, the European Commission argued in favor of extending this procedure to apply to the conclusions of agreements having global economic and commercial implications.
Lisbon Treaty[edit]
With entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009, the assent procedure was renamed consent procedure, and it was defined as part of the special legislative procedures, as opposed to ordinary legislative procedure (formerly codecision).[1]
Under the consent procedure, the Parliament express its approval on a Council draft act by an absolute majority vote, without possibility to amend it. Informally, the Parliament is involved by the Commission since the beginning of the procedure, in order to guarantee its consent, although the Treaties do not formally prescribe it.[1]
References[edit]
- ^ a b c European Parliament Legislative Procedures
- ^ Craig, Paul; Grainne De Burca; P. P. Craig (2006). EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 117. ISBN 978-0-19-927389-8.
and terms
- Acquis communautaire
- Direct applicability
- Direct effect
- European labour law
- European Enforcement Order
- Gold-plating
- Four freedoms
- Home state regulation
- Indirect effect
- Incidental effect
- Minimum harmonisation
- Maximum harmonisation
- Preliminary ruling
- Precautionary principle
- Principle of legal certainty
- Recasting
- Principle of conferral
- Proportionality
- Staatenverbund
- State liability
- Subsidiarity
- Supremacy
- Council Regulation (EC) No. 1206/2001
- Council Regulation (EC) No. 1348/2000
- Customs Regulation 1383/2003
- Regulation (EC) No 261/2004
- EU-Eco-regulation
- Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2257/94
- Commission Regulation (EU) No. 1170/2011
- Customs Regulation 3295/94
- Regulation on roaming charges
- Brussels Regime
- CLP Regulation
- Regulation on Community designs
- Societas Europaea
- European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006
- REACH
- Rome II Regulation
- Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation
- Good Clinical Practice Directive
- Data Protection Directive
- ATEX directive
- Battery Directive
- Best available technology
- Biocidal Products Directive
- Birds Directive
- Capital Requirements Directives
- Clinical Trials Directive
- Computer Programs Directive
- Conditional Access Directive
- Copyright Duration Directive (93/98/EEC)
- Copyright Term Directive (2006/116/EC)
- Cosmetics Directive
- Dangerous Substances Directive (67/548/EEC)
- Dangerous Preparations Directive
- Data Retention Directive
- Database Directive
- Database right
- Directive 2000/43/EC on Anti-discrimination
- Directive establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation
- Information Society Directive (first Copyright directive)
- Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications
- Directive on the Promotion of the use of biofuels and other renewable fuels for transport
- Directive on the re-use of public sector information
- Directive on Electricity Production from Renewable Energy Sources
- End of Life Vehicles Directive
- CHP Directive
- Directive on the energy performance of buildings
- Directive on the enforcement of intellectual property rights
- Directive 2004/38/EC on the right to move and reside freely
- Environmental liability directive
- European SEA Directive 2001/42/EC
- European units of measurement directives
- Habitats Directive
- Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control
- Internal Market in Electricity Directive
- Landfill Directive
- Directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions
- Directive on the legal protection of designs
- Markets in Financial Instruments Directive
- Measuring Instruments Directive
- Medical Devices Directive
- Posted Workers Directive
- Pressure Equipment Directive
- Rental Directive
- Resale Rights Directive
- Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive
- Satellite and Cable Directive
- Directive on services in the internal market
- Temporary and Agency Work Directive
- Trade Marks Directive
- European Directive on Traditional Herbal Medicinal Products
- Unfair Commercial Practices Directive
- Universal Service Directive
- Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive
- Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive
- Waste Incineration Directive
- Waste framework directive
- Water Framework Directive
- Working Time Directive
- ECJ Rulings (Caselex): Allonby v Accrington and Rossendale College
- Apostolides v Orams
- Bosman
- Cassis de Dijon
- Chacón Navas v Eurest Colectividades SA
- Chen
- Ciarán Tobin
- Coleman v Attridge Law
- Costa v ENEL
- Factortame
- Francovich
- Kamer van Koophandel en Fabrieken voor Amsterdam v Inspire Art Ltd
- Kolpak
- Microsoft Corp. v. Commission
- Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA
- Metock
- Nordsee
- Palacios de la Villa v Cortefiel Servicios SA
- Peter Paul and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
- Procureur du Roi v Dassonville
- Ralf Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent und Markenamt
- Tanja Kreil
- Van Duyn v Home Office
- Van Gend en Loos