Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nick (talk | contribs) at 13:07, 5 April 2019 (→‎User:Sheldybett: fix). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
Please review Wikipedia:Rollback before making a request. Applicants with fewer than 200 mainspace edits are unlikely to be granted this right. More importantly, applicants must have a measurable track record of counter-vandalism and no recent history of edit warring. The counter-vandalism training program is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.

User:TheGreatWikiLord

I would like to use WP:Igloo to help with fighting vandalism, as it will make my job a little easier. Igloo requires rollback permission. So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 15:12, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. You had a run-in with another admin and an experienced user a few months ago and while the topic of using the correct summary in your reverts was quickly forgotten, the problem lingers. This is not good faith and nor is this. This is being declined for now because of the temperamental issues in the other discussion and because you're not correctly differentiating between good faith edits, test edits, and vandalism yet. Anarchyte (talk | work) 11:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Under StiKi I marked them as test edits. Teh software StiKi automatically marks test edits as AGF. So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 11:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Don't blame the software for poor edit summaries. Every edit you make with it is vetted by you so if you know you'll post an incorrect summary using it, don't use it. Anarchyte (talk | work) 12:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the issue isn't even the edit summaries saying "good faith" instead of "test", it's the judgment calls you're making themselves. Both of those edits are obvious vandalism, yet you incorrectly identified them as good faith test edits. This means you're still incorrectly differentiating between obvious vandalism and good faith edits, which was the exact same reason that you were declined before. And while that's a minor issue, you're still failing to show us that you're capable of taking on board this simple criticism. Swarm– Sting · Hive 🐝🐝🐝 13:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Deauthorized

I use Twinkle for reverting vandalism, adding warns to users talk pages, and reporting/requesting page protection. However, I noticed that users that use Huggle are able to clear vandalism and warn users faster than I can. Therefore, I am requesting the rollback permission so that I am able to use Huggle without any restrictions, and to be able to clear vandalism faster and more efficiently. I understand that good faith edits should not be rolled back and that rollback should only be used on vandalous edits and/or in my own userspace. Deauthorized (talk) 20:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Manupriy Ahluwalia

I have been for a while now on Wikipedia and keeping off spam, vandalism which comes in my knowledge. I have been now mostly working on quality work on Wikipedia with adding pending information, correcting content and fighting vandalism. It will help me more to work on to the issue. If possible give me a period of time. Manupriy Ahluwalia (talk) 05:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Scorbunny

To whom it may concern: As an extended confirmed user currently engaged in counter-vandalism, I am requesting rollback rights to remove vandalism more effectively. Scorbunny (talk) 08:15, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:IanDBeacon

I have been using WP:TW on here and the Simple English Wikipedia for quite sometime, plus Popups everywhere else, and thought that this may help supplement my usage of WP:TW, and hopefully WP:IGLOO as well. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:03, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tulsi Bhagat

First of all, please see my previous request. As said there, I'm active a bit against vandals these days, and the slow internet connection here in Nepal prevents loading Twinkle Gadget which upsets me most of the time. So that I would like to request you to re-grant me the revoked permission which will be quite helpful for my anti-vandalism task. Thank you for your consideration. Have a good weekend. Kind Regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 07:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sheldybett

I’am requesting to have access to the Rollback toll to make my job little more easier for me when I’ve been reverting vandalism for some time, plus I have been at Wikipedia for several months now and i’am a extended confirmed user, also I would be reverting test edits as well. Sheldybett (talk) 12:08, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 12:10, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done User currently at WP:ANI for disruptive editing, likely to be topic-banned and on current form, likely to be blocked for a lengthy period. Nick (talk) 13:07, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:JeBonSer

I have already these pending changes reviewer rights so to further counter-vandalism I must also have these rollback rights to make my job little easier on fighting vandalism. JeBonSer (talk | sign) 12:44, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&oldid=891068007"