Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MusikBot (talk | contribs) at 04:00, 21 April 2019 (Bot clerking: archiving (1 denied) (0 open requests remaining)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

I occasionally stumble on articles where it would be convenient to rollback rather than revert each edit manually. I am familiar with Wikipedia guidelines and believe i can differentiate between vandalism and good edits. I hope to be of help to the community with this right. Lapablo (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No measurable track record of counter-vandalism. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EDG 543 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)

I think this would be a helpful feature to have at my disposal and I believe I meet the qualifications. I have 1350-ish edits.-EDG 543 (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No measurable track record of counter-vandalism. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:56, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have been using Twinkle for a couple of years to manage occasional vandalism when I come across it, which includes some limited Rollback-like functions. It would be more efficient to have official Rollback permission. I am not sure what information I can give you to help in your deliberations: I have over 20,000 mainspace edits over more than 5 years, never been blocked, used several tools with no problems (Twinkle, AWB, Refill). If there is anything you want to know, please ask. Gronk Oz (talk) 13:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Yes, you do have over 20k mainspace edits, but 66% of your edits are automated, and only 0.6% or 148 edits are reverts. When I your reverting I don't see any track record where I can establish you've been fighting vandalism. Also most of your recent twinkle edits are page tagging, which is not vandalism reverting, so I'm struggling to find the track record. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for taking the time to explain your reasons. --Gronk Oz (talk) 14:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]