Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Appearance
Rollback
- Lapablo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I occasionally stumble on articles where it would be convenient to rollback rather than revert each edit manually. I am familiar with Wikipedia guidelines and believe i can differentiate between vandalism and good edits. I hope to be of help to the community with this right. Lapablo (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done No measurable track record of counter-vandalism. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
EDG 543 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I think this would be a helpful feature to have at my disposal and I believe I meet the qualifications. I have 1350-ish edits.-EDG 543 (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done No measurable track record of counter-vandalism. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:56, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Gronk Oz (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have been using Twinkle for a couple of years to manage occasional vandalism when I come across it, which includes some limited Rollback-like functions. It would be more efficient to have official Rollback permission. I am not sure what information I can give you to help in your deliberations: I have over 20,000 mainspace edits over more than 5 years, never been blocked, used several tools with no problems (Twinkle, AWB, Refill). If there is anything you want to know, please ask. Gronk Oz (talk) 13:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done Yes, you do have over 20k mainspace edits, but 66% of your edits are automated, and only 0.6% or 148 edits are reverts. When I your reverting I don't see any track record where I can establish you've been fighting vandalism. Also most of your recent twinkle edits are page tagging, which is not vandalism reverting, so I'm struggling to find the track record. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for taking the time to explain your reasons.
--Gronk Oz (talk) 14:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for taking the time to explain your reasons.