Talk:2000 United States Senate elections

United States: Government Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on United States Senate elections, 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.in.gov/sos/elections/results/sos_ge2000v%21act%3DOffice%26office%3DUS+Senator.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081016123234/http://www.stand-deliver.com/star_ledger/goodfaith.asp to http://www.stand-deliver.com/star_ledger/goodfaith.asp
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120716031705/http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9405E0D7153BF933A1575AC0A9669C8B63 to https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9405E0D7153BF933A1575AC0A9669C8B63

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Winner

Wouldn't the Republicans be the winner Cheney's election as VP broke the tie? GamerKiller2347 (talk) 06:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

• The tie wouldn't be broken until 3 weeks after the new Congress. So, for those three weeks, Democrats had the effective majority (with Gore's VP vote). But the real answer to your question is that there isn't really a "winner" when there's a tie like that. —GoldRingChip 15:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

@GamerKiller2347: & @GoldRingChip:, this exact topic is being debated at the moment, at 2020 United States Senate elections. -- GoodDay (talk) 12:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)