This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
I find the majority of the Districts to be quite biased agaisnt Republicans. The language and information provided is obviously biased, they also contain a lot of unsound speculation, missing sources and personal political opinion (and many spelling errors). I edited District 8 because that's where I live and has some knowledge on but I couldn't figure out how to do references. I think its well balanced now. I am new to Wikipedia editing so please correct me if I do something wrong.
Bellz (talk) 01:01, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
From working on these pages for various states, it appears most of the verbiage is based on CQ Politics, Rothenberg and Cook Reports, generally considered to be non-partisan. I've been adding links for those sources to clarfiy that. Flatterworld (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
