A fact from 2022 Ohio Issue 1 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that after the Ohio Supreme Court imposed restrictions on bail procedures, the dissenting justices participated in a bus tour to campaign for a ballot measure that took away their power on that topic? Source: [1]
More of a comment rather than a review, but I'm not actually sure if the hook can run anytime soon. WP:DYK says that hooks about election candidates can't run within 30 days of their election (except for multi-article hooks that mention all candidates). While the page doesn't mention anything about non-candidate ballot measures, I wonder if would violate the spirit of it. To be sure I'll ask for clarification on WT:DYK regarding this as well. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: In general the article looks good, the main issue is that it needs to be updated with the election results. Some minor points: I don't think the "Supporters of the measure..." paragraphs need to be in the lead. Now that the measure has passed, I think the "Reactions" heading is probably better as "Supporters and opponents" or maybe "Opinions"? I would expect "Reactions" to cover the measure's passage. Legoktm (talk) 08:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Legoktm: Thanks for the review. I've added the current results and updated the tense of the article. In looking at other similar articles, it seems like "Campaign" is the typical section title. I believe that a brief overview of arguments for and against the measure is an important part of the lead. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 07:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
More of a comment rather than a review, but I'm not actually sure if the hook can run anytime soon. WP:DYK says that hooks about election candidates can't run within 30 days of their election (except for multi-article hooks that mention all candidates). While the page doesn't mention anything about non-candidate ballot measures, I wonder if would violate the spirit of it. To be sure I'll ask for clarification on WT:DYK regarding this as well. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Full review needed. Nomination will not be able to run on the main page prior to 12:00, 9 November 2022 (UTC). BlueMoonset (talk) 02:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
In general the article looks good, the main issue is that it needs to be updated with the election results. Some minor points: I don't think the "Supporters of the measure..." paragraphs need to be in the lead. Now that the measure has passed, I think the "Reactions" heading is probably better as "Supporters and opponents" or maybe "Opinions"? I would expect "Reactions" to cover the measure's passage. Legoktm (talk) 08:46, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Awesome, looks good (I fixed 2 minor tense issues as well)! Legoktm (talk) 04:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)