Talk:Aeritalia F-104S Starfighter

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Aviation: Aircraft

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / European / Italian

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force European military history task force Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

Primary units?

In this edit the primary units were switched to metric without discussion. It is a Lockheed (American) design, the F-104S flight manual dimensions and performance figures are all feet, inches, knots and miles. This change should be reverted, taking the opportunity to remove the myriad unsourced details in the specs section. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Since it's a licensed production, I've no issue with using metric here. I think that's standard practice in most such articles, but I haven't surveyed it to be certain. I wholeheartedly support removing the myriad unsourced spec details. BilCat (talk) 18:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Given that most of the cn tags were added by the editor who added the data in question, in the same edit...Nigel Ish (talk) 18:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Now cleaned up.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)