Talk:American Nations

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.

United States Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Quebec Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.

What is the relevance of the pictures in this article?

I'm not sure what the three images in the right-hand section are doing. They don't really seem to be relevant to the text of the article at all? Bpmurphy (talk) 09:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

I agree. Pinging @Larsson10: who added them, to participate in the discussion. Schazjmd (talk) 14:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

I see what the editor was trying to do, but they impart little information at best. Especially given their size, and in comparison to the amount of text in the article, and the paucity of the captions. Perhaps the Mayflower compact be kept because it's evocative to the general reading public of similar images of the founding of the nation, parallel to nations, but improved caption to tie it to the text? Portraits of individuals are useless here, IMO, and we definitely don't want to invite 8 more images so each nation is represented. JesseRafe (talk) 15:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

A larger, clearer version of the map shown on the book cover would be much appreciated. --Khajidha (talk) 11:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

I agree but I can't find one with acceptable licensing, and I don't believe a non-free version would meet the requirements of WP:FAIRUSE. Schazjmd (talk) 14:40, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Historic current events in Yankeedom region

I’m wondering about the Civil rights movement in Yankeedom from there perspective 169.244.13.130 (talk) 18:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Reviews

Here we have a book that is purportedly about history, yet not one review from a professional historian in this section. Just geographers and journalists. That might have something to do with the fact that Woodward is not a real historian and his theories are flawed enough that most professional historians ignore them. Jonathan f1 (talk) 19:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

I'm not sure what your point is. Editors can't do anything about the lack of reviews by historians. Schazjmd (talk) 20:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)