Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Archosauromorpha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconAnimals Low‑importance
WikiProject iconArchosauromorpha is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Animals To-do:


WikiProject iconPalaeontology Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Help

[edit]

Dinosaurs heleosaurus not able to be found. Please Give me site to get info. Animilia notresponding.

There's no dinosaur by that name, can you double check the spelling? Are you maybe thinking of Heliocanthus, which is another name for Rioarribasuchus, an aetosaur? Dinoguy2 (talk) 21:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think he is referring to the Heleosaurus that appear with a question mark in the archosauromorpha phylogeny. It was recently shown that it wasn't a diapsid at all but a varanopsid (pelycosaur) [1]. ArthurWeasley (talk) 02:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't Aenigmastropheus placed in Protorosauria?

[edit]

If nobody replies to this, then I may just remove it from the Archosauromorpha cladogram. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.73.93.182 (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because it ain't sadly :( Golden Wraith Terror (talk) 23:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Because Protorosauria is polyphyletic. Patachonica (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Studies which discuss Aenigmastropheus so far are by paleontologists who consider Protorosauria to not be monophyletic, so they don't use the term. Don't remove it from the Archosauromorpha cladogram because that would be misrepresenting the study which is cited. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 03:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]