Talk:Asda

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Asda is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Leeds

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Leeds, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Leeds on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Food and drink Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Ireland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethics

Could a sensible section on the ethics of this supermarket be added perchance? Despite winning awards recently, Walmart are embarking on a 'chip-away' policy to worker's rights.

lobos

Ownership

Hi - Various editors keep changing the "parent" in the infobox to the Issa Brothers (or their consortium). Walmart is still the owner pending regulatory approval and the sale concluding. If editors are of a different view please raise it here rather than constantly changing it to the Issa Brothers. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 16:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

The 'Notes' tab should be removed

In my opinion, the 'Notes' tab should be removed if no information is added to it as in my opinion it is pointless having an empty tab contained within the article. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 00:30, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Agreed and removed. Dormskirk (talk) 01:20, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Splitting proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

I propose that the section about Asda's history be split into a separate page called History of Asda. This section is large and well-sourced enough to make its own page, can be expanded upon, and it rather large. Lewcm Talk to me! 23:07, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Oppose It is very unusual to split out history sections for UK companies and I don't think it is necessary here. Also much of the existing history section appears overly long as it is written in single sentence paragraphs which does not comply with WP:PARAGRAPH, which says "One-sentence paragraphs are unusually emphatic, and should be used sparingly." In my view, the section should be condensed rather than split out. Dormskirk (talk) 23:25, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

My apologies, I wasn't aware of that. I've decided to withdraw my proposal, and I'll have a look at working on that section per your recommendations, thank you! :) Lewcm Talk to me! 11:29, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.