Talk:Associated Aviation

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Companies

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

Nigeria

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airlines

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
	This article is supported by the airline project.

Do we really need a separate article about Associated Aviation Flight 361?

The accident is notable, but (for the time being), the story is told in a few sentences. In its current shape, Associated Aviation Flight 361 does not really add anything beyond the information that is already presented here, at the "accidents" section. What are your thoughts and comments?--FoxyOrange (talk) 22:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Oppose merger - The accident article should contain more information for example when the result of the accident investigation is known it will be detailed on the Flight 361 page but would only appear as a sentence in the brief summary on this page. MilborneOne (talk) 23:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Oppose merger - I agree; it is too early to say the separate article is superfluous. Carbonix (talk) 11:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Suggestion Postpone this discussion until the investigation is complete. We will then be in a better position to make an informed decision as to where the subject matter belongs. 86.5.176.168 (talk) 14:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Associated Aviation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100925060836/http://www.flyassociated.com/index_files/Page517.htm to http://www.flyassociated.com/index_files/Page517.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)