Talk:Autoimmunity

Medicine High‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Autoimmunity.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Autoimmunity article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWLArchives: 1: 365 days

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Ambiguous wording

I'm not sure if this is just me, but this part of the introduction seems confusing and obscure:

The misconception that an individual's immune system is totally incapable of recognizing self antigens is not new. Paul Ehrlich, at the beginning of the twentieth century, proposed the concept of horror autotoxicus, wherein a 'normal' body does not mount an immune response against its own tissues.

I don't really understand this. Can someone clarify what it means? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.3.102 (talk) 17:43, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - to provide unreferenced and argumentative debate about what autoimmunity is NOT doesn't constitute an adequate introduction. Could someone who is knowledgable about the field please expound more about the boundaries of the topic itself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.91.106.141 (talk) 09:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it either. Firstly, the sentence is triple negated: misconception, incapable, is not new'. Secondly, the expression capable of recognizing self antigens appears unclear to me. Recognizing them in order to attack them or in order not to attack them? Thirdly, it is also bad that this is an argumentative statement . I'll try to change the wording so it will at least appear more clearly, but later, we should edit it more throughly. --Sasper (talk) 02:37, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Amin Jenna Deep Explore

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 October 2023 and 30 November 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JMR2024 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by JMR2024 (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]