Talk:Avnillah-class ironclad

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Avnillah-class ironclad article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Avnillah-class ironclad has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Avnillah-class ironclad is part of the Ironclad warships of the Ottoman Empire series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 18, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed
January 7, 2019	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / Middle East / Ottoman / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Ottoman military history task force
	World War I task force

Former countries: Ottoman Empire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Avnillah-class ironclad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 04:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

in Design, "limited by the Ottoman Empire's limited" perhaps change one to "restricted"?
- Works for me
in Characteristics, where were the 75 mm QF guns mounted? Did she originally have a secondary battery?
- The sources don't say, unfortunately.
suggest centring the Laid down and Completed columns in the table for consistent appearance.
- I'm not sure if that's possible with merged cells
  - Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ah, I have quite a few articles to copy that template over to! Parsecboy (talk) 01:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
link Constantinople
- Done
worth pointing out in either the table or text that both Thames Iron Works and Samuda Brothers were in London, from the name, I assumed Samuda was a local yard until I followed the link
- Good idea
which Gio. Ansaldo & C. yards were they rebuilt at?
- Added
worth mentioning and linking/redlinking the two armored cruisers that sank Avnillah, I assume this information is available and they would be notable?
- Good idea
suggest using the NHHC licence template for both images, along with PD-USGov-Military-Navy
- Done

That's me done. Placing on hold for these points to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Peacemaker. Parsecboy (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]