Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Ballad (music)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconSongs
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Note icon
This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconMusic/Music genres task force
WikiProject iconBallad (music) is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.


Spelling

[edit]

I corrected some obviously wrong spelling, but I wasn't sure if analagous was en-uk or not, let me know if it is. Bassgoonist 19:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable title

[edit]

This title implies that the article at ballad is not about music, which it most certainly is. Even worse, when you combine the information at all the articles about ballad, it would not seem like much of a stretch to conclude that anything with a melody or meter constitutes a ballad. Why don't we eliminate the word "music" from the English language and replace it with ballad?

Seriously, I am old enough to remember when ballad did not include the contemporary definition of a love song, but was instead just a musical story. I remember being puzzled by the use of the term for "love song", but, like Niemöller, I didn't sing traditional folk ballads, so I said nothing. And now, there is nothing that is not a ballad.

I guess, if this is really how the world is defining the term (or, more accurately, failing to define), then it's not Wikipedia's problem. But I want to know that this is how it's really being used. This concept of "instrumental ballads" strikes me as being positively oxymoronic. I know that the editor has included citations, but it's nothing that we can check on without a trip to a major library. I think I'm going to have to ask for documentation on this plethora of meanings of "ballad", or I may begin to do a little raising of the ears. Unschool 00:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

[edit]

Given the above problems, which still persist, that is to say the oxymoronic title and the crossover between the two articles, I have suggested that the additional material from this article be merged into Ballad. Clearly only one article is necessary and it is logical to use the more standard name.--Sabrebd (talk) 13:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sentimental ballad which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]