Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Maaloula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Maaloula article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconMilitary history: Middle East
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Middle Eastern military history task force
WikiProject iconSyria Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

[edit]

why does it say a christian town? the town is half muslims half christian and there is at least one mosque. most of the muslims there are locals who converted to islam but retained their Aramaic language thats why maloula along with its muslims neighbours bakhaa and jibdeen still speak aramaic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.47.190.241 (talk) 01:27, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

funny that you would claim the town for islam after everyone there evacuates. what benefit would a muslim or islamic group gain from speaking aramaic? is there an aramaic qur'an? why is that more interesting than an aramaic targum? 173.14.238.118 (talk) 02:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing

[edit]

Rebel forces retook the city. Part of the same battle or a different one? Coltsfan (talk) 13:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting question. Probably we'll have to wait for external sources to determine it is one way or the other. Apdency (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There was three major battles in this city, and probably there is a fourth to come (the government will counter attack soon). I would say it's unwise to create a article for every battle fought there. Coltsfan (talk) 22:35, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And the government retook Maloula. It's the fourth time the city change hands in one year. Shouldn't that be in the article? Coltsfan (talk) 17:12, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Ma'loula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]