Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconAnimation: American / Films High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconDisney High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFilm: American / Animated
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Animated films task force.
WikiProject iconLibrary of Congress Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as High-importance).

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

[edit]

@Poirot09: I don't understand why you reverted my DAB. I wasn't identifying which of the 25 stand-alone articles titled Beauty and the Beast (xxxxx) this one is, since as you noted, the note in parentheses specifies which it is, but to help the reader find the article they're looking for. I.e. "Ensuring that a reader who searches for a topic using a particular term can get to the information on that topic quickly and easily, whichever of the possible topics it might be," per WP:DAB. YoPienso (talk) 03:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yopienso Explained at WP:DABLINKUG. Poirot09 (talk) 20:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Poirot09 Thank you. But I still don't understand. WP:DABLINKUG says, For example, Treaty of Paris (1796) should include a hatnote pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Paris (disambiguation). We have exactly the same situation with movies titled Beauty and the Beast: Beauty and the Beast (1934 film), Beauty and the Beast (1946 film), Beauty and the Beast (1962 film), Beauty and the Beast (1978 film), Beauty and the Beast (1983 film), Beauty and the Beast (1987 film), Beauty and the Beast (1991 film), Beauty and the Beast (1996 film), Beauty and the Beast (1997 film), Beauty and the Beast (2005 film), Beauty and the Beast (2009 film), Beauty and the Beast (2014 film), and Beauty and the Beast (2017 film). Best, YoPienso (talk) 00:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yopienso Read the following sentence: "For example, Mirror (1975 film) is clearly about one specific movie and not about any of the many other meanings of "Mirror", and most users will know to type Mirror in the search box to find other topics." Poirot09 (talk) 13:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies for the delay in responding. Real life suddenly became busy and I can't really spend time on this discussion.
I believe you're editing in good faith and are trying to be collegial with me. I've found your terse comments difficult to understand, though. YoPienso (talk) 13:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

[edit]

According to WP:LEADSECTION, it should contain "no more than four well-composed paragraphs" as a rule of thumb. In this article, however, the lead section is currently six paragraphs. Given that, should we consider trimming it down? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]