Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Black Robe (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconFilm: Australian / Canadian / American
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
WikiProject iconAustralia: Cinema Low‑importance
WikiProject iconBlack Robe (film) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Comparison to Dances with Wolves

[edit]

During the early 1990s, either the Chicago Tribune or the Chicago Sun-Times printed an article in which it stated that the success of Dances with Wolves compared to this film was a sign of political correctness. It said that Dances made Native Americans look good while this film did not. Others may argue that this film was dark and tragic and thus would not seduce viewers who like happy endings. jcm 8/21/8

The absence of a coherent thought in your comment makes me wish for a nuclear war. jpb 11/04/09 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.62.66.128 (talk) 23:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The comments above make sense if you'd seen the film. Many Natives in the film are portrayed as horrible savages who skin their victims alive. European culture is portrayed as bright and beautiful with images of magnificent architecture while Native culture is dark, cold and foreboding. Native American culture does not appear very enlightened in any way in this film. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.154.103.157 (talk) 23:42, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually what the film showed was that the seventeenth century was shitty. Dances With Wolves was basically a sightly updated rehashing of the "noble savage" idea, whereas, one could argue, Black Robe showed Natives in a more realistic light. Natives weren't peace-loving proto-hippies; they were human beings, with all the baggage that comes with that, occasional brutality included.172.163.46.34 (talk) 19:07, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Robe (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Robe (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong spelling of Kiotsaeton

[edit]

Once erroneously introduced the name of the chief of the Iroquois/Mohawk was from then on constantly wrongly written, even in the IMDB: The correct name is (in Brian Moore's novel) "Kiotsaeton", not "-seaton". Moore might have taken the name from the famous chief of the Mohawk, the "wampum man" of Three Rivers/Quebec in 1645. ThomasMore52 (talk) 14:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]