Talk:Black rot

Fungi Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Agriculture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horticulture and Gardening Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Possible Copyright Violation

I am not familiar with copyright law, while looking for sources for this page I found this site [[1]] which appears to be identical except for the images, anyone with more knowledge please your input is welcome.--Matt 15:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't know that this is strictly illegal, since the source is not marked as copyrighted, but I would call it unethical and misleading to present it here nearly verbatim. --EncycloPetey 15:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

On review this appears to be a Copyright violations, the first version is copy and paste from the reference provided. The original editor (Special:Contributions/Emo_Penguin) made a series of large unrelated contributions on the same one day contribution history. I will be shorting this to a stub and reworking to eliminate the copyvio. if the contributor was in fact the author of the text, then even if it is published elsewhere under different terms, they have the right to post it here under the GFDL if the author grants GFDL it is a good idea to make a note of the situation on the discussion page if the content is reposted. Jeepday (talk) 15:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black rot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080408124600/http://www.ca.uky.edu:80/agc/pubs/ppa/ppa14/ppa14.htm to http://www.ca.uky.edu/agc/pubs/ppa/ppa14/ppa14.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)