Talk:British V-class submarine

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Military history: Maritime / Balkan / British / European / French / Nordic / World War II

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present) British military history task force European military history task force French military history task force Nordic military history task force World War II task force

changed 615 hp to 800 hp, 615 hp was the number for the preceding U-class, the V-class had improved diesel engines.

Vickers-Armstrong

According to Conways(1922-46) half the subs were built on the Tyne, not all at Barrow so have removed the Barrow built ships cat. Galloglass 19:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC). Absolutely true. All the eight vessels built under the 1941 Programme were built at Barrow, but Vivid, Voracious, Vulpine and Varne of the next batch were built at Walker, as were Virulent and Volatile of that batch - and every vessel listed subsequently in the article (which I've now re-sequenced into programme order). Rif Winfield 13:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)