Talk:CIA Tibetan program
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
Central Asia Mid‑importance | |||||||
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. | This article is within the scope of||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
Changed importance from top to mid on WP:Tibet and WP:China
[edit]While the article’s subject certainly deserves mention, the amount of intervention was relatively small and doesn’t seem to have had a great effect on Tibetan history.Wikimedes (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- I guess that's controversial. The cia clearly knew that tibetans couldn't win. Hence giving them weapons, funding Etc and enabling them to fight china.. What did you expect? Chinese to just stand there while tibetan using American procured guns and rpgs shooting at them. And then later pointing and saying that Chinese massacred them. But leaving out the awkward part that CIA was no stranger to orchestrating coupes to destabilise countries via encouraging infighting. Alot of people died and the worst part is the Americans CLEARLY knew the war could never be won by tibetan rebels. They only practically used the tibetans to weaken china and get Intel. Dai lai lama critised America for allegedly using them. Hence the Cia would be motivated to downplay this.
So my question to you is how do i know you aint trying to downplay this inconvenient topic by degrading the importance level. Perhaps this is history that should not be buried to Protect transparency of information. People should be more aware considering the cia was tibetan rebels' most central and active ally. Training them, arming them, smuggling them and giving them political support via anti-communism sentiment and military scheming support.
Hence I think it should be at least higher ranked with modern Tibet articles and not hidden.
120.18.180.210 (talk) 18:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
when did the CIA admitt this programm?
[edit]DXPIN (talk) 12:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Clear Violation of WP:NPOV
[edit]Wikipedia:Neutral point of view is required for all articles, yet after User:Khedroob, with an account created in December 2023, made two major edits that make the article sound more like hagiography than history. FIREYSUNSET (talk) 19:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
adding to the 1958 section on the establishment of a base in triguthang by the rebels trained by the cia
[edit]- C-Class Central Asia articles
- Mid-importance Central Asia articles
- WikiProject Central Asia articles
- C-Class Tibet articles
- Mid-importance Tibet articles
- WikiProject Tibet articles
- C-Class China-related articles
- Mid-importance China-related articles
- C-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles