Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in Chile

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Chile Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

COVID-19 Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Pulmonology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Viruses Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for COVID-19 pandemic in Chile (34 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 18,967 18,967 Background 2,822 2,822 Timeline 405 62,048 2020 13 47,409 March 22,733 22,733 April - May 4,293 4,293 June 9,013 9,013 July - August 6,018 6,018 October - December 5,339 5,339 2021 161 13,221 January - February 2,484 2,484 March 6,731 6,731 April - May 3,047 3,047 December 798 798 2022 1,013 1,013 Statistics 196 220,011 Daily report 89,967 89,967 Charts 15 129,848 Cases 49,908 49,908 Deaths 39,459 39,459 Health care situation 15,565 15,565 Vaccination program 24,901 24,901 Distribution per region 30 3,410 Summary 3,380 3,380 Impact 242 26,049 Events 2,400 2,400 Politics 13,597 18,553 Postponement of elections 4,956 4,956 Wildlife 4,854 4,854 Notable cases and fatalities 5,877 5,877 See also 124 124 Notes 48 48 References 33 33 External links 837 837 Total 340,226 340,226

WikiProject COVID-19

I've created WikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, --Another Believer _(Talk) 17:57, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Can someone please update "Case summary" section

Can someone please update the section "Case summary" or just revert it to older format, which will be easy to read (Refer Spanish version page). --Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 16:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Ignore, Updated that table by referring revision history --Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Comment: It was updated with cumulative count instead of daily new cases count, data is incorrect for the specified template. Hence reverted it to old format, If you feel like using the below template then please update the new cases count for each region and then replace the existing table. --Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk)

Done. Ok to make the switch? Emailsson (talk) 20:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

@ Emailsson Sure, Go ahead --Naveen N Kadalaveni (talk) 20:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Mistake on Additional deaths

Number of 653 additional deaths is incorrect. 553 additional deaths is the correct amount.

--PetrixImmanol (talk) 15:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Covid-19 recoveries

Chile has 186,441 recoveries — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.51.215 (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

It is not. The government stopped releasing the number of recoveries due to the criticism in the way they catalogued them. [1] --B1mbo (talk) 15:13, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

References

Request for comment - cases change metrics

Please take part in discussion here: Project COVID-19, Medical cases charts - change type — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kohraa Mondel (talk • contribs) 23:09, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Active cases

Hi, I looked into here and the Ministry of Health has a graphic of the active cases that looks different to the one in the articles, specially in June when, remember, they made some changes to the way they counted them. Should we change the information in the graphics of the article to show this information? I think we should as our graphic of the active cases is based on daily reports and looks very unnatural (again, specially in June), and the information provided by the Ministry in the link takes into account other factors to update the past daily cases, giving a more realistic approach to the real number of cases. Best regards, James2813 (talk) 19:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm not sure if it is correct to change the data currently. Most of the data is based on the daily reports; the only exceptions are the deaths and the vaccination progress, considering in both cases the government has mentioned they are updating actively the numbers (vaccination data is uploaded almost immediately, while deaths have a delay by default given the certificates take a few days to be made). In the case of active and recovered, the numbers are counted using the daily reports and the definition of active and recovered did change -in fact, there was a lot of criticism to that change-. I'm not sure if we should update that data because a) it reflects the change of criteria, and b) then we will have to update all data to the current number. --B1mbo (talk) 02:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)