This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
So, the lede on the main page that lead me here, and the word choices in the first few sentenced and on the sidebar, definitely violate NPOV through the use of activist language/perspective. And I say that as someone who put almost 20 years into the movement. I don't come to WP to read my own propaganda; rather, I'm looking for an encyclopedia which presents all the relevant info with as little subjectivity as possible. Different word choices could achieve this without omitting facts.
The cops here were, when these events occured, policing an activist march at the location the activists chose to occupy. There are certainly other ways to inform the reader that the police response was considered heavy handed or unjustified without pretending the cops marched on the Castro.district with the intention of laying beatdowns and making arrests. 199.7.157.24 (talk) 13:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
