Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Celebrity (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCelebrity (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 16, 2020Good article nomineeListed
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconAlbums
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
WikiProject iconPop music High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconR&B and Soul Music High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Celebrity (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Artwork and title

[edit]

I deleted the line about JC and Joey’s hairstyles because it seemed a random point to include. Yes, the hairstyles are objectively bad, but do they really stick out on artwork that is already exaggerated? It seems more of a subjective detail being included in an article that is supposed to be neutral. Y2k lemonade (talk) 23:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The inclusion of the sentence is used to describe the writers' reception of the artwork, similar to the critical reception section. By all means if there are any positive opinions about the artwork, feel free to include it with the same citation-styled sourcing on the article per WP:CITEVAR. — Angryjoe1111 (talk) 04:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]