Talk:Christmas tree stand

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Christmas tree stand article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Christmas tree stand appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 741 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a plant pathologist conducted research on Christmas tree stands that showed just 6 of 22 had adequate water capacity for large Christmas trees?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/December.

Wikipedia

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Holidays: Christmas Mid‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Christmas task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Some Possible sources

~~[1]~~, ~~[2]~~, ~~[3]~~ (good for a "Types" section), [4] (not sure what this one is exactly), [5], ~~[6]~~, ~~[7]~~, [8], ~~[9]~~ (possible EL? not a source to be sure), [10]

Regardless, information here is sparse and a decent article (say DYK quality) will probably take 12-15 sources, just my best guess. These results are a perusing of Google Books and up through the 31st page of regular Google web hits, if you want to search for more start at page 32 of the Google hits. --IvoShandor (talk) 15:33, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have struck through those links that I have used in some way, there may still be minimal info to cull from those links that have been struck through. --IvoShandor (talk) 05:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some other sources: [11], [12], [13], [14] (Pop. Sci and Pop Mech. etc. describing makeshift tree stands)

--IvoShandor (talk) 05:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Christmas tree stand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]