Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Christopher W. Shaw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
WikiProject iconUnited States Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 04:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Thriley (talk), Silver seren (talk), and 7&6=thirteen (talk). Nominated by Thriley (talk) at 15:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Christopher W. Shaw; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Note: Article is at AfD; looks like it will be kept. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reviewer needed; AfD closed as "snow keep", so DYK nom can proceed. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll take it. By the way, good job saving this article from AfD. AdoTang (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: The "favorable reviews" of his research could use some expansion—that's four citations yet only one sentence—but that's just my own opinion and isn't a DYK requirement, seeing it already passes the minimum article length. Unless anyone has any other concerns or I missed something, this should be good to go. AdoTang (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]