Talk:Clearchus of Soli

Philosophy: Philosophers / Ancient Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces: /  Philosophers Ancient philosophy

Greece Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Hebrews

"Clearchus reported a dialogue with Aristotle, where the philosopher states that the Hebrews were descendants of the Indian philosophers"

The source provided makes no mention of Hebrews. It says Jews, not Hebrews. Hebrews and Israelites have only been synonymous with Jews in relatively recent history. Even in the original Greek version, it says ἰουδαίου which translates to Jew but only because of mainstream Judeo-Christianity's concensus to make Yehudim/Judean/Judaism/Jewish all the same thing. This is historical revisionism. The article about Herod's kingdom requiring everybody to practice Judaism is factually incorrect. Observe the law of Judea, which the modern religion of Judaism is a continuation or from a religious perspective (a similar claim can be made for all Abrahamic faiths). Religion didn't exist back then the way it does now, it was government.

In that example, not everybody in Judea was Jewish. Not ethnically or religiously. This is such a taboo topic, but an encyclopedia should not bow down to a religious concensus. Facts are not determined by majority faith-based opinions. The same thing goes especially for Hebrews and Israelites. The religious concensus is the only concensus. It ignores the Haiburus and the various Iberians (Ireland, Spain, Georgia, Russia) as possible historical Hebrews in favor of nothing historical as proof. It ignores the Jutes as Jews as in Anglo-Saxon-Jutes despite all the evidence to the contrary that the historians turn a blind eye to.

So equating Hebrews with Jews from a source that already elsewhere treats them as separate is a mistake which many people believe because the terms have become synonymous mostly for political and revisionist purposes, mostly within the last century — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.147.97.27 (talk) 05:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Are his writings available online?

The article contains a list of his writings. Are they available online? It would be useful to know where/how to access his writings. Pete unseth (talk) 14:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)