Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
Jump to content

Talk:Climate Council

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconAustralia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconClimate Council is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject iconEnvironment
WikiProject iconThis environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconClimate change Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

NPOV[edit]

This article, especially the "Projects and purpose" section, uses sensational and unencyclopedic wording such "capturing the public's imagination", "groundbreaking research" "courageous catalyst", "climate crisis", "authoritative and expert", "hold Australia's leaders to account" and "landmark report" in ways that bias the article towards the subject and give undue weight to the subjects point of view. Furthermore, the article portrays the subject in an entirely positive way, and does not include any negative commentary on the subject. 053pvr (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough comment. I'll take a look Gumsaint (talk) 03:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Cut a lot out. Article still relies too much on primary sourcing. FemkeMilene (talk) 18:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]