Talk:Clumber Park

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nottinghamshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clumber Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120223233915/http://www.bassetlaw.gov.uk/pdf/Clumber%20Park.pdf to http://www.bassetlaw.gov.uk/pdf/Clumber%20Park.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

National Trust pilot

Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

The next stage of the pilot to to look at enhancing pages relating the the most recent Top 10-most-visited National Trust sites by fixing missing citations. Please let me know if you have any concerns Lajmmoore (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Some of the content is unsupported by references, and after getting in touch with the site team, these are two aspects of the page the content that they cannot verify:

1. [history section, paragraph 3] There's some content in the article that refers to artworks destroyed in the 1879 fire.

2. [sale and demolition paragraph] No reference to support the involvement of Charles Boot in the demolition.

If other editors can access sources to verify these sections, that would be great Lajmmoore (talk) 22:06, 15 December 2022 (UTC)